Sparky of SoCal wrote:I think it is all who you believe. One might have to think twice about just about everything you read,
http://www.westernjournalism.com/enviro ... es-frauds/ Just saying...
Sometimes its hard to accept the science and easier to disagree with it. Because the finding and consensus my be inconvenient and lead to lifestyle changes that one does not want to make. So people believe what we want to believe without carefully and unbiasedly studying the data. After taking the position of convenience, "Denial", it is easy to jump on the corporate band wagon and side with there ridiculous rhetoric.
About Western Journalism.com , it is a conservative source pushing an agenda and they no only disregard facts that do not serve them well they construct and redesign information to do as they will with it. The founder and still main stakeholder is Joesph Farah who has promulgated the following... "It'll plague Obama throughout his presidency. It'll be a nagging issue and a sore on his administration, much like Monica Lewinsky was on Bill Clinton's presidency" and "It's not going to go away, and it will drive a wedge in an already divided public."
I figure one that argues that scientists make shit up just so they have work applies to journalist too, but consider that to be just more rhetoric.