Whether Or Not Russians Hacked DNC Means Nothing Concerning How Newsworthy The Details AreThe tactic used by the DNC to distract the public from the issue is laughable. Blaming it on the Russians might get a reaction out of people over forty, but most people couldn't care less whether it was the Russians or the Chinese or a bunch of fourteen-year-olds with nothing better to do. The biggest problem with the tactic is that there is little or no evidence that the Russians were involved.
Of course, whether or not you believe that may depend on how credible you find the big cybersecurity firms like CrowdStrike, FireEye and Mandiant (the big names that always pop up in situations like this). For what it's worth, these guys have something of a vested interest in playing up the threat of big hacks from nation-state level hackers.
So-called experts often abuse their status as experts and provide misinformation to help out a client or move an agenda forward. They cherry pick the data and use it to bolster claims which can't actually be substantiated.
And yet, we already have stories arguing that "Putin weaponized Wikileaks to influence" the US election. That's ridiculous on multiple levels. Wikileaks releases all kinds of stuff, whether you agree with them or not. And the idea that this will actually impact the election seems... unlikely.
LINK:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160724/17512435054/whether-not-russians-hacked-dnc-means-nothing-concerning-how-newsworthy-details-are.shtml