Page 17 of 25

Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:44 am
by surfsteve
surfsteve wrote:I watched a video about google yesterday that was saying google might be charged with treason.


Found it!


Peter Thiel throws bombshell accusation at Google

Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 8:21 am
by CrustyOldFart
surfsteve: Google should without a doubt be charged with treason and so should every elected official who has backed this whole sanctuary city craze. Lock 'em all up and throw away the freaking keys!

Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 7:38 pm
by ergot
Censoring Satire as Fake News
The Babylon Bee is very similar to The Onion, but libtards don't seem to understand!

Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:47 am
by shotgunmary
CrustyOldFart: Ab-so-freaken-loot-ly! Round the whole bunch of them up and put 'em away for good! There's no need for people who want to ruin this once great country!

Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Sun Aug 25, 2019 6:21 am
by pcslim
FALSE CLAIM IN FORBES ARTICLE: GATEKEEPING IS NOT CENSORSHIP
There is no functional difference between GATEKEEPING and CENSORSHIP. To make matters worse for the guy who wrote the article in Forbes, GATEKEEPING is only necessary when resources are limited. For instance, a publishing company cannot afford to publish every manuscript that gets sent to them. To do so would be costly and they would go out of business rather quickly. Such is not the case for online platforms such as YouTube or Facebook and so there is no need for GATEKEEPING in the traditional sense. But even when justified by economics, GATEKEEPING still is just a subset of behaviors which fall into the category of CENSORSHIP. Basically the thesis of the article discussed in this video is completely invalid and utterly absurd.
Baizuo (pronounced "bye-tswaw) is a Chinese epithet meaning naive western educated person who advocates for peace and equality only to satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority. A baizuo only cares about topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT and the environment while being obsessed with political correctness to the extent that they import backwards Islamic values for the sake of multiculturalism.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=baizuo


Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Sun Aug 25, 2019 6:43 am
by pcslim
Lawsuit over big tech censorship strikes at core of American values
So far lawsuits over this issue have either not been filed or have been unsuccessful. It is troubling when the legal system teams up with big media to squelch political speech. It looks like the tide might be turning, but up to this point many have been silenced in a manner which should be totally illegal.

Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2019 7:37 pm
by ergot
PragerU v. YouTube
Finally someone is challenging YouTube and by extension Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc.! This is a must win lawsuit!

Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Sat Sep 07, 2019 1:19 pm
by MojaveMike
Joe Rogan | Chappelle's New Special Had 0% on Rotten Tomatoes
Vox and Vice and the other libtard media companies tried to persuade people that Chappelle's special wasn't worth watching. The backlash was massive!

Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2019 6:18 am
by desertrat
MojaveMike: Dave Chappelle's recent special was probably the funniest thing I've seen in years. His comedy hit the mark and then some. Being edgy is a big part of what makes comedy compelling and Chappelle delivered the goods!

Re: Internet Censorship

PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2020 6:39 am
by drdesert
Finally Some Good News for a Change!
Fakebook is at it again. Their always coming up with sleazier and sleazier ways to censor the opinions of users. This time they've created an "independent" group of moderators who will do the dirty work for them. Censorship is censorship and it should always be illegal, especially on platforms such as Fakebook, or Tweeker, or Youtube. All of these should be treated as public utilities and the free speech rights of users should be protected.